Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses.
Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses.
If you hang one, the rest will hang themselves.
I recommend every American read the PDF document linked here and below titled; Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses (Eighth Edition, December 2017).
This document lays out the process of how "going up the ladder" is important when it comes to election fraud and holding those responsible who participated. The system is so corrupt that even when the laws regarding the investigation and prosecution of election fraud are crystal clear, as they are in this document as to what has to happen in cases of election fraud, the real reason nothing was done in 2020 may be due to one of two reasons:
The fraud was/is too big to prosecute as endless people were in on it, and endless people are blackmailed to keep their mouths shut to not take on voter-fraud cases, other than the occasional low-level player.
It's a sting operation to catch as many people engaging in election tampering and fraud as humanly possible.
By law, a fraudulent election has to be certified BEFORE an investigation can take place. Therefore, it would make sense that the good guys would let the voter fraud of past elections occur, as an on-going sting operation would catch more players. This also doesn’t mean that voter fraud isn’t happening nor isn’t being caught as it’s happening, as evidence of such crimes can Cleary be gathered at anytime, as we are currently seeing.
Federal investigations can only take place regarding federal elections and state elections can only be investigated by state law enforcement officials. But, given that Presidential elections are federal, if 2020 was a sting operation, then 2024 may be also. If that’s the case, then the bad guys are stepping in their own trap yet again.
The document states on Page 2:
There are several reasons why election crime prosecutions may present an easier means of obtaining convictions than do other forms of public corruption:
• Election crimes usually occur largely in public.
• Election crimes often involve many players. For example, successful voter bribery schemes require numerous voters; ballot box stuffing requires controlling all the election officials in a polling location; and illegal political contributions generally involve numerous conduits to disguise the transaction.
• Election crimes tend to leave paper trails, either in state voting documentation or in public reports filed by federal campaigns.
Within this document it clearly states that everyone involved needs to be found and caught, and that you start with a low-level player (Ballot-Box stuffer), you squeeze them, and then you go all the way up the ladder. Such an investigation would take down not only our country, but foreign countries and their politicians as well, and endless U.S. politicians, State Governors and money lenders. Interestingly, in this document it clearly states that the prosecution of those at the highest levels of this voter fraud illegality, is in fact a deterrence strategy, specifically in cases of vast crimes as voter fraud would be; and that this deterrence method is used as a deliberate tactic to save time in investigations and save the tax-payers money. If guilty parties don’t kill themselves or claim they were not involved, they will be caught.
The document states on Page 5, specifically regarding Federal Jurisdiction:
Election crime cases tend to be long-term projects focusing on individuals with different degrees of culpability. The ultimate goal is to move up the ladder of culpability to candidates, political operatives, public officials, and others who attempted to corrupt, or did corrupt, the public office involved.
Regarding the advantages of Federal prosecution, the document states on Page 7-8:
Four characteristics of the federal criminal justice system support the federal prosecution of election crimes despite the primary role of the states in most facets of election administration:
• Federal grand juries, the secrecy requirements of which help protect the testimony of witnesses who tend to be vulnerable to manipulation and intimidation.
• Federal trial juries, which are drawn from a broader geographic area than are most state juries, and thus lessen the possibility of local bias.
• Resources to handle the labor-intensive investigations generally required for successful prosecution of election crime.
• Detachment from local political forces and interests.
The document also states on page 8-9:
The federal prosecutor’s role in matters involving corruption of the process by which elections are conducted, on the other hand, focuses on prosecuting individuals who commit federal crimes in connection with an election. Deterrence of future similar crimes is an important objective of such federal prosecutions. However, this deterrence is achieved by public awareness of the Department’s prosecutive interest in, and prosecution of, election fraud – not through interference with the process itself.
Again, why did this not happen in previous elections? Laziness among state-level investigators? Most certainly. Bribery to not investigate? Sure. But, all that does is catch more people breaking the law, because they most certainly communicate their illegality in writing and in openly-surveilled communications.
In essence, this could be the largest sting operation regarding voter fraud, let alone any issue, in the history of our country.
If the nationwide illegality of voter fraud isn’t fixed once and for all, and at least some players at the higher levels in the ladder are not prosecuted and sent away to prison (if not executed), then we've lost our country forever. If some are caught and prosecuted (including Governors of States and other well-known high-ranking public officials), the rest may hang themselves when they see what awaits them.
Suicide weekend.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday (10/25/24) ruled all mail-in ballots must be received by election day in order to be counted.
The panel of three Trump-appointed judges – Andrew Oldham, James Ho and Kyle Duncan – said Mississippi was violating federal law by counting mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day.
“Congress statutorily designated a singular ‘day for the election’ of members of Congress and the appointment of presidential electors,” the 5th Circuit panel said, according to CNN. “Text, precedent, and historical practice confirm this ‘day for the election’ is the day by which ballots must be both cast by voters and received by state officials.”
The RNC and other watchdog groups like Judicial Watch filed lawsuits in Mississippi seeking to stop the counting of mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The Democrats use mail-in ballots to cheat.
“The 5th Circuit’s ruling is only binding on the three Southern states covered by the circuit, and for now, the panel is not ordering that the policy be blocked in Mississippi for the current election, instead sending the case down for more proceedings,” CNN reported.
RNC Chairman Michael Whatley celebrated the massive election integrity victory.
This is a big deal and great news!
Click here for the Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses (Eighth Edition, December 2017).
BIO: Sean M. Brooks is the host of the podcast American Education FM and the author of several books including; The Unmasking of American Schools: The Sanctioned Abuse of Americas Teachers and Students. He’s also on Gab, Truth, X, Bitchute, Rumble and everywhere audio podcasts can be heard.
FANTASTIC CONTRIBUTION! THANK YOU!!!
Voting matters, but in a weird way:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/to-vote-of-not-to-vote
And I am expecting orchestrated riots after the elections, but I don't care for lynching or, for that matter, even for taking revenge. If all who have been complicit with the plandemic died, the globalist plan of 95% would be most likely outdone:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/crime-and-punishment