Over the next few articles, in close succession, I’ll be showing how simple it is for an Open Records Requests (ORR) to reveal more than one might imagine regarding the conduct, motives and tone of American K12 school officials.
ORR’s are state law and anyone can request an ORR anonymously at any time from a K12 school districts treasurer. One does not even need to be associated with the district directly, nor live in the same state or jurisdiction. A simple, anonymous email request is all that is needed, along with a list of the keywords to search for that will produce the desired emails. For example, you might write in an email to the district treasurers office;
“I would like to request and ORR for the emails of (insert name[s]) that contain the keywords; vaccinations, masks, testing etc.”
The more keywords that are sought, the more emails you will receive. However, being descriptive with ones keyword selection will increase the likelihood that the request will be fulfilled. K12 districts will use excuses to not provide such documents. The length of the search or the broadness of the keywords will be their first excuse. To alleviate this problem, simply request a small time-frame for the emails, such as the time span of a few months (i.e., emails requested from January 7th, to March 25th of 2022).
While some ORR’s may be declined, notifying the states Attorney General in writing can apply pressure to the K12 district to comply. Most ORR’s will be returned in electronic format via email, but make sure to request in the initial email that the district take into consideration the size of the documents being sent, as they need to fit within the email in order for it to go through. Request that they be sent in PDF format.
While we know that K12 schools districts have openly engaged in the largest crime against humanity; regarding mask-wearing, social-distancing, quarantining, contact-tracing, vaccination-status intimidation etc., it’s one thing to hear it from parents and co-workers, yet its another to read it straight from the sources themselves. While much of this may not be surprising, I assure you—you’ll never know what you may find within K12 district emails via an ORR.
Below are examples of email correspondences between superintendents, school board members, HR directors, staff members, parents, health departments and state education departments during 2021, and how perhaps one of the major take-aways is that K12 school districts are in the business of misleading everyone, including themselves.
A K12 school district’s connections to endless agencies for advice and guidance, should solidify for everyone that American K12 school districts do not work for parents or students. They work for local, state and federal government agencies; including those companies that are interested in controlling and tracking the health and whereabouts of minors.
I will make a post of an email from such an open records request, and then describe some of the findings in the text below the picture. Here we go.
In the above email, a superintendent is telling their entire districts’ staff that allegedly if they don’t mask students the insurance company for the district will drop their coverage. This email is either a purposeful deception to justify mask-wearing, or the districts insurance company is actually afraid of receiving illness claims because people believe that NOT wearing a mask will increase the spread of COVID. What’s horrifically ironic, is it’s the actual act of mask-wearing that is causing the most physical harm.
The easiest way for an insurance company to drop a school districts coverage, is to flood the insurance company with claims of injury with a staff member or a student as a result of mask-wearing, with physician documentation to prove this is the case.
This email reveals, among other things, that vaccinations do not decrease the likelihood of getting sick. This open admission contradicts the administrative pressure to get vaccinated, which will be shown in the next email. This above email also shows the interest of the superintendent to have everyone vaccinated, regardless of its lack of effectiveness is preventing illness. This also is an attempt to justify the further implementation of mask wearing by using low-vaccination percentages as any reason for high levels of illness; (None of which exists, because only the vaccinated are getting ill).
I think it’s safe to say that three “PLEASES” are a dire request to have all staff “vaccinated.” Not to mention, a bribery of $50 and a notice that you will not be quarantined if you have been “vaccinated,” along with getting the job done at the fair grounds like you’re cattle.
I also find it interesting that HR needs to know your vaccine status. This is clearly for the purposes of contact-tracing in order to receive federal funds, along with perhaps the “succession planning” that is taking place within HR departments, regarding their need to know who will be alive in the next few years and who may not be.
This particular email is laughable. It clearly show an interest in hiding the truth from many, at the expense of countless. It also shows a lack of being able to connect the dots—that the vaccinated are the ones getting ill, while the unvaccinated are not. It’s also more admission that the vaccinated are spreading the illness (the jab poison is being transmitted) thereby rendering the vaccines useless toward the prevention of an illness. It also shows that the state is not mandating vaccinations, but the local entities are, and they can’t figure out why the state won’t mandate them (lawsuits).
This email above highlights the interest in contact-tracing, in particular regarding figuring out who is “vaccinated” and who is not. While such information is no ones business by law, contact-tracing information is being tied to ESSER funds and being misinterpreted by K12 districts. They have to keep the surveillance methods in place, or the money will dry up.
This email above is a doozy! It’s an open admission that a county health department CANNOT discriminate against the “unvaccinated.” Yet, the K12 superintendent sounds unhappy with this decision. This email also shows a lack of knowledge involving how every jab is EUA (emergency use authorization) only, while at the same time implying that the “vaccines” have full FDA approval for 16-years of age and older. This is also NOT true. There is also increased pressure to pad the numbers of contact-tracing by strongly encouraging parents to reveal their “vaccine status” and that of their children attending this K12 district.
In Lifting The COVID-K12 Veil: Part II. Revelations from open records requests within American K12 schools; it will be shown that recommendations are being made and recommendations are NOT laws, nor are mandates. Part II will also describe the testing methods for COVID, and the pressure to rely on these tests, are only adding to the contact-tracing statistics, even though the testing methods (specifically the BINAX Test being used within this specific district) are faulty and have been recalled by the FDA. The next batch of emails will also show that BINAX is selling their faulty products to K12 districts, directly with the help of the K12 school districts acquisition of ESSER and CARES Act funds.
Future parts of this Lifting The COVID-K12 Veil series will also include topics such as; the infighting that is taking place within American K12 schools, student discipline, the inability to acquire bus drivers and substitutes, and balancing the public image—along with much more.
As the veil is being lifted, the candle of American K12 and university education is burning at both ends. It’s only a matter of time before the light goes out.
BIO: Dr. Sean M. Brooks, Ph.D. is the author of several books including; The Unmasking of American Schools: The Sanctioned Abuse of Americas Teachers and Students, and he’s the host of the podcast American Education FM.