Discover more from The American Classroom
As I continue to highlight the work of Sabrina Wallace in this latest article, I take one of her latest videos and some of the documentation she discusses within and summarize it to the best of my ability.
I continue to believe that this is the most serious element of our current war that is taking place, yet it’s unfortunately receiving little to no attention. Frankly, this is not hard to understand, yet this needs to be understood by the masses so that it can gain traction in future discussions among those with larger platforms. Ignorance on this issue is not an excuse. In the ongoing dysgenics program that continues to plague the world, wireless and molecular communication with the use of intrabody nanotechnology and biosensors are a serious element that has been studied and written about for decades, yet it’s not been challenged by the masses as being a weapon against humanity.
In 2014, an article titled Molecular Communication described this emerging field of study as the following:
Molecular communication is an emerging communication paradigm for bio-nanomachines (e.g., artificial cells, genetically engineered cells) to perform coordinated actions in an aqueous environment. This interdisciplinary research is considerably different from the traditional communication system, since it utilizes not electromagnetic waves but biological molecules both as carriers and as information. It originally mimics the existing communication mechanisms in biology, e.g., communications among micro-organisms.
Molecular communication has a variety of potential applications in the biomedical, military, and environmental areas. The most direct and promising applications are in the biomedical field. The advantages provided by molecular communication are from size, biocompatibility, and biostability. Some envisaged applications are drug delivery system (DDS), bio-hybrid implants, and lab-on-a-chip (LoC) systems.
Again, as with most of these white papers, they openly tell you about the ubiquity of this technology, the departments in which they’re being studied and used, and how human beings are the intended target.
In another article titled FGOR: Flow-Guided Opportunistic Routing for Intrabody Nanonetworks; the abstract states the following:
The advancement of nano communication has opened the door for the development of intrabody medical application services. Flow-guided nano-communication networks have gained major attraction in recent years as an effective solution for intrabody sensing and actuation. This article builds a three-layer vertical network structure for intrabody nanonetworks, i.e., nano nodes, nano routers, and gateway, where data packets generated by nano nodes are relayed to the gateway through nano routers or other nodes. However, how to guarantee the data transmission through the way of multiple hops in such a scenario is an unsolved challenge. In order to improve the throughput and reduce the energy consumption of intrabody nanonetworks in a single-flow environment where the nano devices are restricted, a flow-guided opportunistic routing (FGOR) protocol is proposed. In FGOR, a relative position (RP) model is proposed to formulate the criterion for candidate relay selection (CRS) and enable the nodes’ direction awareness to the gateway. Moreover, the CRS criterion is redesigned through a mobility gradient (MG) model further derived from the RP model. The candidate nodes are prioritized based on node ID, available energy, and RP information of nodes to perform backoff forwarding for decreasing transmission redundancy. Simulation results show that the RP model improves the throughput and significantly extends the lifecycle of intrabody nanonetwork by reducing the energy consumption. Compared with the RP model, the MG model performs better in terms of delay and successful transmission rate, especially within the circulation environment of intrabody.
In the 51 references within that article, the earliest reference dates back to 2008 from an article titled; “Nanonetworks: A new communication paradigm.” Moreover, this is not only an old course of study and nefarious technology, but as you can see in the figure below referenced from the above article, titled FGOR: Flow-Guided Opportunistic Routing for Intrabody Nanonetworks, the attempt is to have the lining of human’s arteries act as a wireless router of wireless information and communication (i.e., molecular communication) and then have human blood streams themselves be contaminated with nanosensors to act as a communicator to the routers, and then to an exterior wireless device (computer, sensor, drone etc. ).
In another article that Sabrina Wallace highlights, titled; Intrabody Molecular Communication via Blood-Tissue Barrier for Internet of Bio-Nano Things, published in 2022, again in the IEEE Internet of Things Journal; the abstract states;
Molecular communication (MC) is an emerging communication paradigm that allows bio-nanomachines (NMs) to communicate using biochemical molecules as information carriers. It can be used in many promising biomedical applications such as the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT) for targeted drug delivery and healthcare applications. In particular, the blood-tissue barrier (BTB) inside the body forms the main communication pathway for molecular information exchange between the NMs as well as between the intrabody nanonetwork and the bio-cyber interface in the IoBNT network. However, overcoming this barrier by the molecules is one of the main challenges for MC in the body. Therefore, spatiotemporal modeling of MC across the BTB is of particular interest. In this article, we develop a mathematical model and stochastic particle-based simulator for MC over high spatiotemporal resolution between mobile NMs in the blood capillary and the surrounding tissue. The transmitting bio-NM is modeled as a moving sphere with a continuous emission pattern over a specific duration. In this work, the blood capillary characteristics, including the BTB and blood flow, are modeled and their effect is examined on the molecular received signal. In addition, we examined the impact of the emission duration, the elimination rate, and the separation distance on the molecular received signal. The numerical results are verified using the developed particle-based simulator. This work can help in the optimum design and development of the IoBNT systems based on MC for biomedical applications, such as smart drug delivery and health monitoring systems.
These so-called researchers (of which the vast majority are Chinese) writing these papers and playing with this technological poison, are always attempting to sell this field of study as a future “precognition” to illness detection. In other words, they believe that by filling your bloodstream with wireless routers and nanosensors, these sensors will be able to tell technology devices both inside and outside of your body when you’re about to become ill or are actually ill. What they don’t tell you of course, is that the very presence of such technologies within your body and on your body, and communicating between and among one another (Apple Watches, sensors, and medical devices), will only make you ill in the first place, if not kill you. Therefore, they can sit back and say; “Hey, look! Our technology is working!” Yet it’s their very technology that is making one sick in the first place. Just like the COVID lie. “Hey look, you have COVID again!” Yet the person who is ill, is not ill with “COVID” because that doesn’t exist. They’re ill becasue of what they have put inside of their body.
Just like in the movie Minority Report (picture above), where they have three semi-lifeless humans floating in a shallow pool of biosensor goo, and hooked up to a computer system and tracking devices, the State (i.e., government) can read the minds of these motionless “pre-cogs” (i.e., precognition) to predetermine when a human in society is about to engage in a crime, to then only intervene with a police force, and then locate and arrest the person before the crime is committed.
In this case of wireless molecular communication, however, the tools that are being implemented are actually weapons designed to hurt and kill people. They are not an illness-prevention device or technological advancement of any kind.
If you thought it couldn’t get worse, there is one final note. This course of application is using A.I. (artificial intelligence) to do the math in order to come up with a form of application within the human body.
In an article published in November of 2023, titled; Molecular Nano Neural Networks (M3N): In-Body Intelligence for the IoBNT; the authors state in their abstract their interest in using A.I. to develop intrabody technologies and communication interfaces in what is called IoBNT (Internet of Bio Nano Things);
Intelligent behavior is an emergent phenomenon observed in biological organisms across all scales. It describes the cooperative behavior of low complexity entities to accomplish complex tasks, which exceed their individual capabilities. This property is particularly important for the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT), which consists of Bio-Nano Things (BNTs) used in the human body, where they face many restrictions, such as bio-compatibility and size constraints. In this paper, we present a novel BNT-architecture, called Molecular Nano Neural Networks (M3N), which allows the implementation of intelligence on the micro-/nano-scale. The proposed structure consists of compartments (low complexity entities) that are connected to each other to form a network. Based on reaction and diffusion of molecules in and between connected compartments, this network mimics an artificial neural network, which is an important step towards Aˆ artificial intelligence in the IoBNT. We provide design guidelines for the proposed M3N and successfully validate it by applying a regression and classification task.
This is not only an open admission that A.I. is in league with the medical field, but they are currently attempting to always apply A.I. in their explanations and design methods to introduce more technology within the human blood stream and within the human body, in an effort to connect it to the wireless body area network (WBAN) under the false pretenses of a health-related preventative measure.
In summary, the enemies of humanity are not improving human health, nor are they preventing illness. They’re instead developing weapons designed to kill humans and those around them by tampering with God’s-designed natural human biology, while deceptively selling their work as a so-called technological advancement and a convenience for the “healthcare” system.
This will not go away until this course of study, these applications, and the people and organizations involved (like the IEEE [Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers] technology associations) are all destroyed. If this line of work and application are not eliminated, it will grow and become an accepted application like Skynet in The Terminator. The only difference is that Skynet was so-called fiction; yet nano-technological molecular communication, their controlled publication outlets and the people within, are very much a reality.
BIO: Sean M. Brooks is the host of the podcast American Education FM and the author of several books including; The Unmasking of American Schools: The Sanctioned Abuse of Americas Teachers and Students. He’s also on Gab, Truth, X, Bitchute, Rumble and everywhere audio podcasts can be heard.