The Hoax of School Shootings: Part I.

A former educators analysis on policy failures and the evidence of a lie.

Entire books have been written about school shootings. Some are written where the author believes they actually happen, while others are written where the author knows that they didn’t happen. What the general public, both here in America and across the world, fail to understand; is that lying happens, and lying happens with school shootings.

Too frequently, people, even today, still believe that “mass shootings” in particular in schools, still exist, in particular if their TV (tell-a-vison) tells them so. That same public are also very quick to believe a school shooting, immediately upon hearing of one. What’s the definition of insanity again; Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. A person who blindly believes something, time and time again, just because someone says they should believe it, is in fact, insane.

So, here’s what I want to do for this month’s two-part article. I want to cover how you can examine “school shootings” or even “mass shootings,” and help yourself determine their validity. We’ll break this down into common and ever-repeating recognizable policy patterns first, then in part two we’ll cover the national reaction and how that gives up the goose.

---

First, each so-called “shooting” in particular within schools, all have the same failed policy patterns. However, we can only see these patterns by being objective and being void of emotion when something like this occurs. Take emotions out of the equation first, and then you can apply the scientific method more reasonably.

Which leads me to my first suggestion. Always apply The Scientific Method.

Every event in life requires the application of the scientific method, but school shootings require, and desperately ask for, the application of the scientific method.

First we have to make observations about the incident or the story being told. This however, is where people immediately stop thinking and don’t engage in even the first step of the scientific method, because they simply believe what they’re told at face value, and go about their day. “A school shooting happened. Ok, anyway, who won the game last night.” Very rarely do people example the entire situation and walk through it as if they were conducting real case-study research.

Now, this is where the flaws come in with the media. The media is designed to do the thinking for you. Both the media, and the writers/actors of these shootings, which typically involve the CIA, the FBI, Freemasons, local Sheriff’s Departments and local police, know that they need to do the thinking for you. They know that they need to fill in the scientific method stages for you, so that you don’t have to think. The sad part, is how effective these agencies are at this, and how even the people who criticize these agencies and know they’re untrustworthy, will still trust them when it comes to “school shootings” or “mass shootings.”

If you make observations about what is happening with a media-driven visible crime scene, you can pick up on the same observations from every so-called school shooting. The patterns repeat. However, you have to remember, that criminals who carry out these fake events are learning from their past mistakes and attempting to build upon their scripts, while removing the holes in their stories that bring about doubt in the mind of the public.

Another element you can use to detect that many of these “school shootings” are fake, has specifically to do with school-based policy, and the failure to apply them in these manufactured situations.

The two types of school-shooter training that exist throughout American schools, are the ALICE Training and the Run, Hide and Fight Training. People need to understand that these two types of training did not show up at the same time. The ALICE Training was first used, but with these fake school shootings, you may now see staff or students running from a scene. This is why you now have the Run, Hide and Fight Training being implemented. This is not only used in an effort to convince students and staff that running, hiding from, and physically fighting a school shooter are the best ways to stay alive, but it’s also implemented because if you see inconsistency in movement from person to person or from school to school, differing policy justifies the explanation of what you have seen.

Let me give you a dead giveaway that the Nashville school shooting was fake (and there are many examples), but I will focus on just a few in this Part I.

In the ALICE Training that was adopted by the Nashville school specifically, it doesn’t call for anyone, let alone an employee with students, to run from a school building, across a busy four-lane street with students in toe, in an effort to escape a school shooter. In fact, that action would get an employee fired for breaking policy, and it would put those children in more danger, potentially. Also in the Nashville scenario, you had staff members lock themselves out of the building right next to the front door, as the so-called shooter was on the second floor of the building. In no scenario would staff members lock themselves outside of the building, because the shooter could easily exit the building and shoot them where they stood. This was the case in the Nashville incident, as it was caught on body-cam footage by the arriving police officer.

The actual policy for most schools and districts across America, requires them to pull in any students who may be in the hallway into their own classrooms, lock the doors, turn the lights off, barricade the door, cover the glass on the door if there is glass, and then stay quiet and stay away from the door and windows. Then, each staff member would email the head secretary and tell them who is accounted for and who is not. This was not the case in Nashville. The claim from Nashville, was that students were all locked-down and secured within a room for an assembly on the second floor, but that two students were not accounted for. This, too, would not be the case, as upon hearing shots or hearing an ALERT of the PA system, staff are required to retrieve the missing students immediately. Again, if the students were all locked down in a single room on the second floor, how did an entire class with a teacher leading the way, run away from the building, across a busy street to an adjacent property?

Another obvious clue has to do with the entrance of the shooter into the building, the tripping of the school-wide alarm, and the location of the entrance. Keeping in mind, that there were allegedly two children unaccounted for who were using her bathroom, as the story goes. You would not have a shooter on the opposite side of the building, with a deafening alarm going off upon entry, and not have ALL students accounted for in a matter of minuets. The “shooter” was walking around the administrative side of the building, not the classroom side of the building. At no pint did the “shooter” run. They were seen on film walking the entire time, while never encountering a single person on released surveillance footage. In fact, the story was, that the shooter encountered the female principal and they fought, to only have the principal shot to death after a struggle. There is no footage of this. Only in cases such as “mass shootings,” can stories be told and believed without any evidence to prove it. Not to mention, the so-called shooter was wearing different shoes upon entry to the building, as opposed to when they where allegedly shot by police on the other side of the building on the second floor. this would indicate that the video footage occurred on two separate days, or at two separate times of the day. Who would change their shoes in the middle of a killing spree? No one would.

This is the “question asking” part of the scientific method that is lost on many people, but it’s also why the media never interviews school staff, both locally nor those who no longer work in the business. They don’t ask them about what happened, because the glaring giveaway is that policy in these cases is never followed. Not to mention, not a single fake school shooting case has resulted in a single employee being fired for failing to adhere to their own policy. In Uvalde, Texas, the female school principal was placed on leave for three days, only to return to her job. This is unheard of when policy was clearly broken.

In real shootings in schools, employees will usually resign or be fired, as was the case in the Oxford High School shooting involving Ethan Crumbley in Michigan. That shooting was real, as the victims were few, the evidence was clear, and shooter policy was followed, but the departing employees were negligent in the warning signs and failed to search Ethan’s backpack that very day, which was also a failure in policy when a possible gun threat existed.

What you will also typically see in a fake school shooting include the following; crowds of police, students and staff looking panicked, lines of students being led out of a building, ambulances, lights flashing, police caution tape, people on cell phones, and most of all—“crisis actors” being interviewed, but not crying. The public even has a hard time believing that crisis actors are real, but they are. Police and government agencies themselves will make online posts about needing actors for a simulated “crisis drill” in a building or a local outside area, and they’ll pay the participates for their time. These events happen in every state and in almost every country, certainly in America and throughout Europe.

In Part II, we will break down more common patterns of the scripted deception and understanding why they occur.

---

BIO: Dr. Sean M. Brooks is the host of the podcast American Education FM and the author of several books including; The Unmasking of American Schools: The Sanctioned Abuse of Americas Teachers and Students, and he’s on Gab, Bitchute and Rumble.