The Perils of Removing Jesus.
"Separation of Church and State" is not law. It's a warning about corruption.
Too many people simply yell “separation of church and state” at the top of their lungs when they want Jesus Christ, the Bible or the other religions to be removed from school environments or government. This is when you know you’re hearing from someone who has the IQ of a pencil eraser. The saying “separation of church and state” is not law. It isn’t found in any American legal document, anywhere, and it’s one of the most inaccurately interpreted sayings that exists.
The “separation of church and state” is a warning about corruption. It’s a suggestion that if you discriminate against a religion or take God out of government, both the government and the church will be corrupted by one another or by a nefarious third hand that seeks to rule over both. It was a warning that governmental political persecution could take place based on one’s religion, and that government should not force religion on it’s citizens or punish them for not conforming to one religion or practice over another. It was also a warning that government is not, nor should even be, a religion of it’s own, nor should it be overtaken by any religion contrary to it’s founding.
In an article written on this subject and posted by Freedomforum.org; they stated the following about the history of the saying “separation of church and state;”
“The words "separation of church and state" do not appear in the U.S. Constitution, but the concept is enshrined in the very first freedom guaranteed by the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." Known as the establishment clause, the opening lines of the First Amendment prohibit the government from creating an official religion or favoring one religion (or non-religion) over another.
The separation of church and state enables all Americans to practice their deeply held beliefs in private and in public.
The United States' founders were committed to a government not overly entangled with religion. In 1644, Roger Williams, the founder of Rhode Island and of the first Baptist church in America, called for a "wall or hedge of separation" between the secular world and sacred church. He believed that mixing the two would cause both to become corrupt. Williams created a colony where the freedom to worship was a right for all. This influenced American thinking for centuries to come.
Though they didn't use the phrase "separation of church and state," the framers of the Constitution debated the extent to which the government should support religion. Some argued that it was fine to mandate participation in religious services, if a person could choose which ones they would attend. More commonly, many of the founders, including Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, argued that government compulsion of religion violated a person's natural right to shape their own life according to their convictions.
Jefferson immortalized the phrase in a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association. Concerned about their status as a religious minority, the Baptist community penned a letter to the president expressing fear about religious persecution. Jefferson responded, emphasizing that the First Amendment's free exercise and establishment clauses together built "a wall of separation between church and state."
For many people coming to America – then and now – religious discrimination by governments was a part of daily life. Both the founders' own experiences with religious persecution, and the reality that the United States is a country with people who have a wide variety of beliefs and backgrounds, made it essential to protect all Americans' deeply held beliefs.
In addition to the First Amendment, each state has separated religion from government, providing protections for religious liberty in their state constitutions. The U.S. Supreme Court has also said that states must uphold this religious freedom principle. Today, the establishment clause prohibits all levels of government from either advancing or inhibiting religion.
"The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state," which "must be kept high and impregnable." – Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, Everson v. Board of Education (1947)
The founders disagreed about the exact meaning of "no establishment" under the First Amendment, and those arguments continue today. But ultimately, preventing government from interfering with religion is an essential principle of religious liberty. Without separating church from state, true religious freedom is impossible.
Allowing one religious group preferential access or power can lead to a polarizing and contentious environment where "We the People" applies only to those in the majority at any given moment. Government support of religion puts some people's rights and beliefs over those of others. In the worst cases, it can require everyone — believers and nonbelievers alike — to jeopardize their beliefs to get equal treatment under the law.
The idea of separation of church and state ensures the government cannot exercise undue influence over Americans' spiritual and religious lives. From ending school-mandated prayer to banning the government from coercing Americans to participate in religious activities, the wall of separation has been an essential tool in building a freer democracy. And this uniquely American approach has resulted in one of the most religiously diverse nations in history.
Critically, the establishment clause separates church from state but not religion from politics or public life. People are free to bring their religious convictions into the public square precisely because the government must treat all faiths equally.
This includes politicians who are free to express their religious beliefs — but not to sponsor legislation based solely on religious convictions. The establishment clause protects the majority from undue influence from the government and encourages lesser-known religious traditions to petition the government for equal rights.
By removing the government's ability to give preferential treatment to one religion (or religion in general), the separation of church and state promotes religious pluralism and allows all Americans to practice their deeply held beliefs in private and public.”
Now, it should be clear as to why we are always fighting a spiritual battle. The saying ‘separation of church and state’ was a warning about what happens when you remove God from government. The Founding Fathers knew this. They also knew that one religion could easily corrupt government and vice versa. Just like we continue to see now in America with the corruption of our government by zionist jews, and the false combining of Judaism and Christianity with the false saying “judaeo-christian.” It’s the deceitful normalization and formation of a “one world” religion, as opposed to a freedom and acknowledgement of separation.
This also poses a huge threat when the subject and implementation of jewish Noahide Laws come into play. These are jewish laws (based on the Talmud) that attempt to make a singular interpretation of religious law that applies to all citizens regardless of their religion, within government itself. Then, government with their government officials and law makers, regardless of ones pre-standing personal religion, nefariously advances itself toward making a one-world government and religion that rules with laws and punishment over the people.
This, too, encompasses anyone (including government officials themselves) vocalizing their removal of people from public places or even encouraging their persecution because they verbally or publicly disagree with a race or a religion. This is why you see and hear the made-up phrase “antisemitism” being tied directly into law. It’s a show of their hand that world governments have been infiltrated by a singular religion and race of people (zionist jews) and that they want their word and rule to be the law of the land, and any opposition to that should be punished. Such a suggestion or implementation is 100% illegal based on United States Constitutional law, but they don’t care.
Use the “COVID” lie as another example. This is what happens when a third hand rules over both the church and the state, and the church and the state behave the same, as opposed to behaving differently.
You had government intervening in church settings and corrupting them with the lies of the “COVID” plandemic and the threats of persecution for non-compliance. Yet, if the church pushed back against government, it was the church that had no persuasion over government. Governments ears were covered. However, most churches blindly followed government’s orders (whether they were local, state or federal) and forced their own participants to comply or else they would be disinvited, removed or persecuted by the church. Therefore, both the church and the state were not separated, but compromised and corrupted by the same entity. This is what the “COVID” lie should have proved to everyone, that when the church and the state work hand-in-hand in a morally decaying direction, they seek to bring down everyone at once. This is what the Founding Fathers were warning us about.
The ‘separation of church and state’ does not mean “get rid of God.” It actually means “keep God in government.” But, if the two become corrupted and work for the same evil hand, then there won’t be a separation and you’ll have an ever-growing crisis.
In the public-school setting in America, in many states, there exists what’s called “Right to Religious Instruction.” While the Satanic Church has their own group that works within public school settings, like the group called The Hellion Academy of Independent Learning or (HAIL), a common Christian instructional group in Ohio is called LifeWise. This group exemplifies this freedom of religious instruction, as does HAIL, even though HAIL is counter productive.
LifeWise, the Christian organization, shows up to a public school with their own buses, typically one day a week (depending on what LifeWise and the school district agree to), to take students to a local church where the receive Christian instruction, and then they return to school to finish out the day without missing any school-related classes. All participation is completely voluntary, and protected by the First Amendment. Participation typically takes place during the lunch hour of a students time in a public-school setting. It’s simply a choice as to whether or not students participate and students can choose to stop participating anytime they want. The same is true with any recognized religious group, regardless of their persuasion.
There have been many schools, as I have brought up on my show American Education FM, where the public-school boards will remove LifeWise as a program because the minority mob wants them gone, simply because they don’t agree with Christianity. When schools remove such a program, they are removing the one thing that the Founding Fathers did not want removed.
Famously, Westerville Ohio’s school board removed LifeWise in September of 2024, after having it for two years without complaint. But, the minority squeaky wheel got the grease, and the all female, communist school-board members removed it, even after the vast majority of its supporters showed up and publicly supported LifeWise and described it’s benefits to students, both individually and in association with the school district.
This should prove to people that American school districts not only don’t know the law, but they feel threatened when a more morally-sound group (like LifeWise) has more influence with the students than they do.
This picture above exemplifies how a small minority mob can corrupt the decision makers. Those who did not support LifeWise (publicly disparaged it, and didn’t participate in LifeWise at all), are sitting on the far right side of the picture, wearing black clothing. The rest of the participants and those in red shirts, are the supporters of LifeWise.
Not surprisingly, this school district’s attempt at a permanent levy failed just over a month later, after their removal of LifeWise, as they saw no problem ostracizing and insulting the citizens of their own city with the unjustified removal of a peaceful Christian instructional group for students. They actually thought there would be no consequences for removing a widely popular, morally-sound Christian academy that positively impacts students, while at the same time inviting religious division to their front door step. They were sorely mistaken.
Remember, government thinks that government is a religion, and those who support government on government’s behalf believe the same. This is the real necessary separation that the Founding Fathers were warning us about; that a separation of church and state could become detrimental to everyone. Ultimately, the Founders didn’t want government to corrupt religion and they didn’t want religion to corrupt government.
In summary, the saying ‘separation of church and state’ was a warning to not remove God from government, or else the state would dictate what religion was and what should be accepted or not accepted; thereby allowing more corruption and control to rear it’s ugly head. ‘Separation of church and state’ has nothing to do with taking Jesus or the Bible out of schools. It has to do with what will occur if you do. Therefore, schools don’t have to promote religion, but they can’t deny it either.
The fake school shooting (here and here) in a Christian private school Madison, Wisconsin this week should show everyone what happens when a separation is lacking between schools, law enforcement, the media and government. They all work hand-in-hand and lie to the masses. It’s just more corruption. Which of course begs the question; do you trust schools, law enforcement, the media and government now?
Radical governments should not control the church, just as radical religions should not control government; nor should they be one in the same. Unfortunately, we are seeing a removal of Jesus Christ from many aspects of society; with government, corporate, and religious influence, as radical religions (jewish zionism) control much if not all of U.S. government and their partners, and even influence other religions. This can be seen when so-called Christian churches enlist female gay pastors who push abortion and normalize genital mutilation among minors. This shows that a separation from Jesus is what is really taking place here, and this is exactly what the Founders warned us about.
The United States was built by those who worshiped Jesus Christ, long before the Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers knew that government had no right to force schooling nor religion on it’s citizens. They wanted people to have the freedom to choose. This is why home-learning is not only legal in America, but highly successful, and it isn’t surprising that it continues to grow. It’s growing because Jesus has not been removed from healthy home-learning environments. In fact, this is where the fight will continue in the coming years. Which state governments will recognize home-learning as a tax-free healthy environment with the freedom to learn and worship, and which state governments will not?
Christian home-teaching mother, former elementary-school teacher, and contributing author to The American Classroom, Cicily Hellekson, was recently asked by a public librarian within her local library, if she was home-schooling her two boys, as the three of them were looking for their latest books to check out and read as a family.
Cicily replied; “Yes.” The librarian replied back; “I can tell.”
BIO: Dr. Sean M. Brooks is the host of the podcast American Education FM and the author of several books including; The Unmasking of American Schools: The Sanctioned Abuse of Americas Teachers and Students. He’s also on Gab, Truth, X, Bitchute, Rumble and everywhere audio podcasts can be heard.