Stealing The Election.

Past plays, current moves and situational theories.

I fully understand that election theories are a bit cleché. However, thinking about them is an exercise for our mind and it can stretch out our thinking. Let’s think of some options that have been considered, but focus in on what we have never seen before as a populace, and how these specific theories may play out. After all, if you give a man a truth, he’ll think for a day. If you teach a man to reason, he’ll think for a lifetime.

This isn’t about being right, nor is it about clicks, popularity, or saying “I told you so,” if one of these scenarios pans out. This is simply a dot-connecting exercise.

I also fully understand, too, that our zionist (jew) occupied government is well in place. This is in fact our true enemy, as unfortunately many refer to them as “the deep state” or “globalists,” or other names. The Al Smith dinner on Thursday night should have proven that, as the room was filled with pretend Catholics who are in fact jewish sympathizers and jews themselves. With that aside for a moment, let’s focus on what we’ve seen before regarding elections.

We’ve seen presidential positions be promised to individuals in a successive order, dating back to at least John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon and Ronald Regan. All were promised the position before they held it and all held the position ultimately, yet when in the position they figured out how bad things truly were. Two were shot, one of those two died, and the other (Nixon) was forced to resign or lose his life when discovering the levels of pedophilia that existed within Washington D.C. and the control that the jews had over the entire system.

We’ve read of voter fraud most recently within the last presidential election of 2020, even though it’s happened throughout the course of our country’s history. We saw the media simply take the election in 2020, and then gaslight the public into believing that Joe Biden won, when clearly he didn’t. In fact, we were told what was going to happen on Election Day in 2020, months before it happened. (July, 2020 Twitter post below):

---

Previous and Current Election Violations:

1. Voting in more than once state.

2. Voting machine software manipulation.

3. Ballot size manipulation.

4. Drop-boxes/ballot-harvesting mules.

5. Voter Roll manipulation.

6. Multiplier mail-in ballot distribution.

7. Nursing-home ballot harvesting.

8. Limiting republican oversight at poling centers.

9. Creating voting machine failures (ballot counters and scanners are purposefully broken).

10. USPS ballot distribution by trucks.

11. Illegals will both vote and not vote, but Democrats will use their total body count as a voter total.

12. Not requiring voter ID or proof of citizenship.

13. Interference with military ballots and other ballots overseas.

14. Pausing vote counting to estimate the need of ballots.

15. Multiple insertions of the same ballot into ballot-counting machines to increase the count.

16. Breakdown in chain of custody while transporting ballots.

17. Extended periods of voting, before and after Election Day.

And many more examples as well.

---

Now, let me throw a few 2024 headlines into this to clearly show that election fraud is still on-going, because the enemy has no choice but to cheat. This, too, is indicative of the fact that people are waking up to voter fraud being very real, where in the past they may have never considered it.

Voter fraud was still fresh in people’s minds back in 2020 and 2021, but many were in denial that such a thing could ever take place on such a grand scale, or that the media would gaslight the public into believing that Joe Biden really won. But, now that voter fraud has taken place and the evidence is overwhelming that this was the case in 2020, even the blind can now see.

---

Now, here are some longer scenarios and possible events that could take place, before Election Day, during Election Day and the days following.

---

Replacing Kamala Harris, Tim Walz (or both) before or after the Election:

BallotPedia states the following, from a legal perspective, regarding a possible change of candidates:

Replacing a nominee between the national convention and the election:

Both the Democratic and Republican parties have rules governing how to replace a presidential or vice presidential nominee between the party's nominating convention and the November 5, 2024, general election. The section below provides each party's rules on that subject. It is important to note, however, that states require political parties to submit names of presidential and vice presidential nominees and presidential electors before election day in order to certify them for the general election ballot. Deadlines vary by state and depend on the election calendar, including early voting, voting by mail, and absentee voting considerations.

Democratic Party rules governing vacancies:

Under Article 2 of The Bylaws of the Democratic Party, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has the responsibility to fill vacancies in presidential and vice presidential nominations between national conventions.

In the event of a vacancy on the national ticket, the chairperson would call a special meeting. Under Article 2 § 8(d), questions before the DNC, with some exceptions otherwise outlined in the charter and bylaws, are determined by a majority vote of the DNC members who are present and voting by proxy. The bylaws also state that voting to fill a vacancy on the national ticket must proceed in accordance with procedural rules adopted by the Rules and Bylaws Committee and approved by the DNC.

Replacing a president-elect between the election and inauguration:

There is no established process to replace a nominee between a presidential election and the meeting of the Electoral College. A party could ask presidential electors to vote for an alternate candidate at the December 17, 2024, meeting of electors. However, as of October 2022, 33 states had laws requiring electors to vote for the candidate he or she was pledged to according to general election results. USA Today's Rachel Looker wrote, "In some states, laws require electors to vote for the winning candidate. If the declared winner drops out before the electoral college meets, these legislatures may have to change the rules so the electors' votes bound to the winner would still count for another candidate."

The Twentieth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution governs what happens if the president-elect dies before taking office. In that case, the vice president-elect becomes the president-elect. It is an open legal question whether a candidate becomes the president-elect after winning a majority of the vote in the Electoral College or only after Congress counts the vote. The Electoral College is scheduled to vote on December 17, 2024, and Congress is scheduled to count the vote on January 6, 2025.

If the president-elect does not die but becomes incapacitated, he could voluntarily transfer authority to the vice-president after Inauguration Day. The Twenty-Fifth Amendment lays out this process. If a president submits a written statement that he or she “is unable to discharge the powers and duties” of the office, then the vice president becomes acting president. The president can regain the powers and duties of the presidency by submitting a written statement that he or she is capable of serving again.

The Twenty-Fifth Amendment also addresses the possibility that the president becomes incapacitated but is unable or unwilling to leave office. In that situation, if the vice president and a majority of the cabinet declare the president unfit to serve, the vice president becomes acting president. The amendment also outlines how the president can reassume the powers of the presidency. If the president declares that he or she is capable of serving, the cabinet and vice president must respond within four days. If this latter group holds that the president is still unfit to serve, Congress must vote on whether to reinstate the president. The president will be reinstated unless a two-thirds majority of both chambers votes against this.

---

Early Voting and Internet Outages:

For the first time, Donald Trump has encouraged people to vote early. This has not happened before. Normally, he’s advocated for voting on Election Day only, and with paper ballots. But, perhaps, this is a two-fold approach. If early voting is overwhelming and the totals come in and are counted, Donald Trump would theoretically win before Election Day ever happens. However, if there is an internet outage that is controlled by the good guys, knowing that the bad guys wanted to do the same thing, this would stop the voting and the vote-counting on all machines and ballot counters. It would force the public to see that internet-based ballot casting is unreliable and that one-day, paper-ballot hand counting is the only way forward. This election process may be done by the military in the future to ensure accuracy, without corrupt civilian control, in particular through the use of machines hooked up to the internet.

An internet outage would throw Election Day into chaos. We know this will happen at specified polling places because this has happened in the past (Arizona 2022), but a larger outage may mean something different is happening.

---

Refusal to Count the Votes or Certify the Election:

Recently, Georgia state bureaucrats have attempted to stop their administrators from certifying the primary elections, back in the Spring of 2024. Now, recently, A Georgia judge has intervened. Intercessors for America stated the following:

Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney of Fulton County, Georgia, ruled that “no election superintendent (or member of a board of elections and registration) may refuse to certify or abstain from certifying election results under any circumstance.” The officials do have the right to investigate their concerns about the vote count and to review related documents, McBurney wrote, but “any delay in receiving such information is not a basis for refusing to certify the election results or abstaining from doing so.”

While there has been ongoing talk and evidence nationwide of inter-agency civil wars among people in positions of power, the election certification process at the state level will bring this civil war to a head. Even the World Economic Forum has called for U.S. politicians to not certify the election if Donald Trump wins. The Burning Platform wrote the following as well;

Do you know who will be in charge of certifying this election?  In January 2021, it was Vice-President Mike Pence, and we all remember how that turned out.  Well, an even more interesting scenario is shaping up this time around.  In January 2025, Vice-President Kamala Harris will be in charge of certifying the election.  In other words, if Donald Trump wins, the person that he was running against will be in charge of certifying his victory.  This is a major defect in our system, and it could potentially set the stage for widespread chaos if things do not go smoothly.

Democrats Jamie Raskin and Nancy Pelosi have famously stated that not certifying the election for Donald Trump is something that can happen.

---

Possible Disruptive Scenarios:

1. The same military that stopped Hillary from winning in 2016 (even though the Trump turn-out overrode the Democrat cheating) allowed Biden to cheat in 2020 to catch more illegality. They will then work to take the Election for Trump and ensure there is no steal.

2. The Q drops were compiled of decades of research and current events and future events regarding the Deep State, the illegal occupation in our country and possible future events regarding military action against this occupation.

3. “The Plan” was developed to destroy and expose the illegal occupiers in our nation and political criminals over a 12 year period.

4. The politicians you see on the Left, (Biden in particular) are controlled by the good guys.

5. Donald Trump is the legal Commander in Chief and signed the Insurrection Act on January 6th of 2021, handing the government to the military.

6. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz will continue to be publicly humiliated in the weeks and days leading up to the election, including serious illegality from the past. This will slow Democrat voting and increase the turnout for Donald Trump, or it will force the hand of the Left to cheat more and stop honest votes from being taken and counted.

7. The early voting before Election Day has already flooded the vote for Donald Trump and he has already won.

8. If a Donald Trump victory is clear after Election Day, chaos will erupt on the streets by those whom the money lenders control (i.e., ANTIFA, Illegals etc.). Military and National Guard intervention would be necessary and must be swift to protect property and the people.

Inauguration Day, Washington D.C, 2017.

---

Military Occupation:

This next option is one that has been discussed at length as well, although not within the mainstream and not very much in many “alternative media” realms. This has to do with military occupation.

In the Law of War Manual, a military occupation is defined as the following in Chapter XI:

11.1 INTRODUCTION

This Chapter addresses military occupation. The GC provides specific rules for the internment of protected persons in occupation, which are addressed in Chapter X.

Military occupation is a temporary measure for administering territory under the control of invading forces, and involves a complicated, trilateral set of legal relations between the Occupying Power, the temporarily ousted sovereign authority, and the inhabitants of occupied territory. The law of belligerent occupation seeks to account for both military and humanitarian imperatives. The Occupying Power’s primary objective in conducting military occupation is to further the purpose of the war in which the occupying forces are engaged and to ensure the maintenance and security of those forces, but the Occupying Power is also bound to provide for the interests and welfare of the civilian population of the occupied territory. The Occupying Power has obligations related to the maintenance of public order and safety, and the protection of civilians and property in occupied territory.

11.1.1.1 Military Occupation, Military Government, Belligerent Occupation, and Martial Law. The practice of conducting military occupation is very old, and the law of military occupation has long been part of the law of war.4 Military occupation is also called belligerent occupation. The conduct of military occupation has also been characterized as an exercise of “military government” or “martial law.”

---

11.2 WHEN MILITARY OCCUPATION LAW APPLIES

The law of military occupation applies when a military occupation exists in fact. Even if the requirements of the law of belligerent occupation do not apply as a matter of law, general law of war principles and rules, such as those for the conduct of hostilities, continue to apply.

Frankly, I found this section to be of interest, specifically regarding the certification of a fraudulent election, as we saw on January 6th of 2021:

11.2.2.2 “Under the Authority” – Suspension and Substitution of Governmental Authority. Occupation also requires the suspension of the territorial State’s authority and the substitution of the Occupying Power’s authority for the territorial State’s authority. The territorial State must be rendered incapable of publicly exercising its authority in the territory, and the Occupying Power must substitute its authority for that of the territorial State.63 Invading forces in possession of the territory must have taken measures to establish their authority.64 For example, such measures may include establishing its own governmental authority for that area and making regulations for the conduct of temporary government.

Finally, there is 11.3 in the Law of War Manual, which states the following:

11.3 END OF OCCUPATION AND DURATION OF GC OBLIGATIONS

The status of belligerent occupation ends when the conditions for its application are no longer met. Certain GC obligations with respect to occupied territory continue for the duration of the occupation after the general close of military operations.

11.3.1 End of Occupation. Belligerent occupation ceases when the conditions for its application are no longer met.81 In particular, as discussed below, the status of belligerent occupation ceases when the invader no longer factually governs the occupied territory or when a hostile relationship no longer exists between the State of the occupied territory and the Occupying Power.82

Belligerent occupation ends when the Occupying Power no longer has effectively placed the occupied territory under its control.83 For example, an uprising by the local population may prevent the Occupying Power from actually enforcing its authority over occupied territory. Similarly, the Occupying Power’s expulsion or complete withdrawal from the territory would also suffice because the former Occupying Power generally would not be able to control sufficiently the occupied territory.

Belligerent occupation also may end when a hostile relationship no longer exists between the Occupying Power and the State of the occupied territory (although, as discussed in the following subsection, certain GC obligations may continue to apply).84 For example, if a new, independent government of the previously occupied territory assumes control of the territory and consents to the presence of the previously occupying forces, then such a situation would no longer be considered a belligerent occupation. Similarly, if a peace treaty legitimately transfers the territory to the sovereignty of the Occupying Power, then the Occupying Power would no longer be characterized as such. However, an Occupying Power is not permitted, under the law of belligerent occupation, to annex occupied territory.85

11.3.2 Duration of GC Obligations in the Case of Occupied Territory. In the home territory of parties to the conflict, the application of the GC shall cease on the general close of military operations.86

In the case of occupied territory, the application of the GC shall cease one year after the general close of military operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such State exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the GC:

• 1 through 12 (general provisions and common articles, e.g., the Protecting Power continues to function, and the derogation for security reasons continues to apply);

• 27, 29 through 34 (humane treatment);

• 47 (preserves rights as against change by annexation or arrangement with the local authorities so long as occupation lasts);

• 49 (transfers, evacuation, and deportation);

• 51, 52 (prohibitions against certain compulsory service and protection of workers);

• 53 (respect for property);

• 59, 61 through 63 (facilitating relief programs);

• 64 through 77 (criminal proceedings); and

• 143 (access by Protecting Powers and the ICRC).

The one-year time limit for the cessation of the application of the GC (apart from the provisions that continue to apply to the extent that the Occupying Power exercises the functions of government in occupied territory) was proposed to account for situations like those of Germany and Japan after World War II.88 AP I provides that the 1949 Geneva Conventions and AP I shall cease to apply, in the case of occupied territories, on the termination of the occupation;89 coalition partners that are Occupying Powers and Parties to AP I would be bound by this rule.

In any case, individuals entitled to GC protection who remain in the custody of the Occupying Power following the end of occupation retain that protection until their release, repatriation, or re-establishment. In addition, it may be appropriate following the end of occupation to continue to apply by analogy certain rules from the law of belligerent occupation, even if such rules do not apply as a matter of law.

---

America has been occupied, not just from an unlawful government in the so-called Biden administration, but also by foreign countries such as Israel, China and the criminal secret societies, jewish corporations and foreign spy organizations that exist within our country that assist in carrying out those countries bidding. Stoping the certification of the election can happen, but it can also be used to end the occupation of our country from these foreign agents and the U.S. politicians that are taking orders from such hostile agencies.

Based on the Law of War Manual, the public does not have to be told this in plane language, but they can be told this in plain language if the overseeing military chooses to do so.

The chaos that would ensue if the public were told the direct truth, would cause heads to explode on all sides, but the truth is the most effective propaganda of all.

---

Q-Post Deltas:

Take a look at the dates of these Q posts and read what was stated back in 2017. Frankly, the posts that begin on November 1st of 2017 all the way through November 5th of 2017 may become more relevant in the coming days. These days, seven years ago, were some of the days that had the highest amount of Q posts in a single day.

Will arrests become public in the days leading up to Election Day, and will these crimes be made public for all to see? Time will tell.

Note how 11.3 and 11.4 are referenced within Q post 34. The prevailing theory is that this is a direct reference to the End of Occupation (11.3) and Legal Position of the Occupying Power (11.4) within the Law of War Manual.

Finally there was this post on November 5th of 2017, which will be our Election Day. This was one of 39 posts on November 5th of 2017:

“10 days” and “Darkness” have been theorized to refer to a possible blackout of internet, or communications nationwide. “Godfather III” has been theorized as referencing the end of that movie when numerous individuals worldwide are arrested, assassinated, or commit suicide as a result of knowing that they’ve been caught.

Inauguration Day, 2017, where representatives of every branch of the Military stood behind Donald Trump at the beginning of his speech. This had never happened before.

---

In conclusion, I would say this. What ever happens, we cannot endure another stolen election; unless that steal is temporary, obvious to the masses and planned by the good guys to wake people up, but this time the military would have to quickly intervene in order to take back control for the American people. Dead politicians at the hands of angry Americans would be the next step, and the good guys and the enemies know this is a possibility.

If Donald Trump were to win outright on Election Day, the evil masses will take to the streets (and this includes any military-aged illegal males who have been organizing here in the States upon their illegal arrival). The local police would be outnumbered and the Federalized National Guard (of which it is federalized) would have to be mobilized quickly and would need to implement lethal force. That action, too, has been eluded to in Q posts, and recently with this DoD Directive 5240.01.

While this directive above is being discussed as a way for the government to kill legal citizens who are deemed a threat (as they falsely believe with January 6th, 2021), this directive can also be used against enemy combatants who are civilians, specifically those who are attempting to interfere with a lawful election process, or those who are interfering with the protection of innocent citizens by the military. Having another January 6th event is not likely, although the enemies within America would certainly like for that to be the case as they could inflict more pain than they did the first time. However, I think the good guys know this and they would not let that take place again.

A delayed election is also a possibility, as would the “law-fare” that would accompany such an action. The Supreme Court may even get involved this time. If military occupation ends or if an election steal is discovered, it’s possible that the election would be re-done and delayed, to only be conducted with paper ballots by the military in the future, for only legal citizens. This would override any thoughts of voter fraud among the masses in America (regardless of political party affiliation). If a delayed election were to take place, say early next year, and that this new election would be conduced by the military, free from civilian input; that would mean same-day paper-ballot casting and hand counting. No drop boxes, no mail-in ballots. It would set the precedent for the future elections in America, once and for all.

Regardless of what happens, don’t forget what has already transpired in the past and what we’ve learned; but also take into consideration what we have not seen yet as a nation. The enemy won’t give up without a fight.

Stay prepared. Stay armed. Stay vigilant.

---

BIO: Dr. Sean M. Brooks is the host of the podcast American Education FM and the author of several books including; The Unmasking of American Schools: The Sanctioned Abuse of Americas Teachers and Students. He’s also on Gab, Truth, X, Bitchute, Rumble and everywhere audio podcasts can be heard.