The Sexually-Transmitted Nature of the COVID Bio-Weapon Shots.
The Sexually-Transmitted Nature of the COVID Bio-Weapon Shots.
The media's contradictions and the probability of transmission.
The media lies, the medical journals and publications are corrupt, the medical profession won’t admit to sexual transmission of illness due to the “COVID vaccines,” and personal reports will dismissively be chalked-up as being “anecdotal.” However, we know better.
Given the nature of electromagnetism as being the ever-present phenomena and cause of transmission of the bio-weapon (as it was purposefully designed this way, i.e., “gain of function”) I want the readers to pay attention to how the media is purposefully hiding the sexually transmitted nature of the “COVID” bio-weapon and how hiding this revelation is not only purposeful, but if the truth were widely known or reported on, it would end relationships (as it already has), increase the rates of suicide upon learning of this fact, and destroy what’s been previously viewed as an impossibility when it comes to sexual contact and reproduction.
All I intend to do here is dot-connect. I’m going to walk through medical headlines and findings from medical journals, and contrast them with headlines from The Exposé, which have been objectively looking at the “COVID” bio-weapon shots and accurately referencing more objective studies, specifically in this case while looking at the reproductive organs of men and women and the impact on fertility and other reproductive diseases.
I also recommending reading this on my actual Substack website (The American Classroom) so you can see the media headlines that I’ll post to help connect these dots, as Substack states again that this article is too long for reading over your email.
First, a pattern worth noting is how the media claims that the so-called “COVID infection” (not the shots) are the cause of other illnesses that are popping up, including cancer. This is the classic distraction that they present. “It’s the illness, not the shots.”
This, of course, has been widely played out with the made-up term “long COVID.” This is the public and medical industry’s justification for damaged DNA and a compromised immune system brought about from the “COVID” bio-weapon shots (i.e., AIDS or VAIDS).
Now, with that said, let me show some headlines that will highlight this point.
Many of these come directly come from left-wing and corrupt outlets, keeping in mind that regardless of the media outlet, there’re all running away from anyone believing that the “COVID vaccines” are sexually transmitted via close physical contact, and or the exchange of seminal and vaginal fluid (specifically related to the transfer of nano-technology or mRNA, from one partner to the other).
POLITICO came out with the following title in 2022:
Remember the Monkey Pox outbreak in 2022? The only people getting this were the “COVID” vaccinated and those with sexual partners who were jabbed. Then, the story quickly went away when those who are homosexual were reporting the most cases. So, how was it transmitted?
Next we have this headline, or a “Fact Check” as USA TODAY likes to call it:
While this article claims with it’s title that the “COVID” bio-weapon shots won’t give you genital herpes, the actual content within the article states the following:
The observational study conducted at the Tel Aviv Medical Center and Carmel Medical Center in Haifa monitored 491 people with AIIRD and 99 controls for six weeks after they received Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. Six women between the ages of 36 and 61 with stable rheumatic diseases developed herpes zoster infection. Five cases occurred after the first dose and one after the second. With the exception of one woman getting HZ affecting the eyes, all five cases were mild and resolved after antiviral treatment.
Therefore, the real facts from these medical observations directly contradict the title of the so-called “fact check.” Point being: the “COVID” shots do cause the related symptoms associated with STD’s.
Now, let’s take a look at the timeline of some publications and their conclusions, regarding those who have been “COVID” vaccinated.
First, in the article above titled “Effects of SARS CoV-2, COVID-19, and its vaccines on male sexual health and reproduction: where do we stand?;” the authors claim the following:
A number of studies have examined the presence of SARS-CoV2 virus in semen (Table 1) [23,24,25,26]. In almost all studies, no viral particles were discovered in the semen of men who were acutely infected or those who were recovering/recovered [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. In only one study, the virus was detected in 6 out of 38 actively infected patients [35] while in another there were viral particles discovered in one man’s semen sample [36]. Overall, based on the current literature, it is unlikely that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted through the semen. This is not as important during acute infection since a person’s respiratory droplets would be easily transmissible, but it is important with regards to sperm cryopreservation or for intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization using ejaculated sperm in recovered men.
This is important to pick apart, because “COVID” isn’t real. There are just injectable poisons (i.e., flu shots, monkey pox shots, Hepatitis B shots, RSV shots, Shingles shots, etc.) and the symptoms that come with them, including the symptoms associated with the introduction of 5G technology.
The paper goes on to say:
To date, there have not been any studies that compare the two vaccine technologies in terms of their impact on fertility, semen parameters, or sex hormones. There have been concerns among the public about the impact of vaccines on sperm and infertility, mostly driven by vocal conspiracy theorists. Some of this fear stems from lack of understanding about newly developed mRNA-based vaccines and the misconception that spike proteins can allow the virus to enter gametes (and other adult cells) and alter the DNA. There has also been a focus on the fact that pregnant women were excluded from both studies and men and women of reproductive potential in the studies were required to utilize a highly effective method of contraception or remain abstinent [55, 56]. This was related to the strict protocols required for clinical trials, not due to concerns that the vaccines would be unsafe in pregnancy or affect fertility/offspring.
When medical journals or medical publications use the excuse of “conspiracy theorists” showing a concern, and they use that kind of derogatory name-calling—they’re hiding something. “Conspiracy theorist” isn’t a medical term nor a scientific justification. Frankly, it shows us that the corrupt medical establishment is panicking.
The next publication also dismisses the reproductive damage that is done from the “COVID” shots by concluding:
…no significant differences in spermatozoa parameters before and after vaccine inoculations were found. Furthermore, oxidative stress analysis, the activity of the cell membrane, and IL‐6, as a marker of inflammation, was not affected by the mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine. These results suggest that this vaccine is safe for male semen quality.
Unfortunately, there is a study from 2004 (yes 2004), where mRNA was measured in the sperm of mice. The study stated the following:
Recently, it has been shown that mouse sperm contain an endogenous reverse transcriptase (Giordano et al., 2000), which can reverse-transcribe RNA into cDNA that are transmitted to offspring upon fertilization (Sciamanna et al., 2003). This observation could also explain the diminution of c-myc mRNA level in the capacitated sperm. Sperm nuclei also have endogenous endonuclease activity (Maione et al., 1997) that could reduce RNA carriage in capacitating sperm.
Using a microarray analysis, Ostermeier et al. (2002) have reported concordant mRNA profiles from testes and sperm of normospermic patients, suggesting that the study of sperm could reflect past events of spermatogenesis and/or spermiogenesis. However, some mRNA distinct from those found in oocytes but similar to those observed in zygotes seem to be testis and sperm-specific and essential to the early embryo development.
A conclusion they reached (in my own words) is that RNA transferability from the sperm to the egg may be reduced when mRNA is present in sperm, thereby potentially limiting reproduction or increasing abnormalities.
This begs the question then; if mRNA is located in sperm, what if the mRNA is located in the female eggs as well? I think we know the answer to that.
Now, The Exposé over the last few years has been on top of this subject, and many individuals who are afraid of losing their audiences, including those in the so-called “truth movement,” are quick to discredit The Expose’ and their referenced findings. In this article below, they stated the following:
A Norwegian study Sep.22, 2023 by Blix et al. of women who self-reported experiencing unexpected vaginal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination. Results are based on self-reported data from questionnaires issued in August and September 2021.
The Authors found:
7725 postmenopausal women (non-menstruating) – 3.3% had bleeding
7148 perimenopausal women (non-menstruating) – 14.1% had bleeding
7052 premenopausal women (non-menstruating) – 13.1% had bleeding
50% of these happened within 28 days of COVID-19 Vaccination
Moderna had 32% increased risk compared to Pfizer
In postmenopausal women, the risk of unexpected vaginal bleeding in the 4 weeks after COVID-19 vaccination was increased two- to threefold
Risk of unexpected vaginal bleeding after vaccination was increased three- to fivefold in both non-menstruating peri- and premenopausal women
The article above from The Exposé, highlights the following point about female fertility:
Information deep in the Pfizer documents notes an important observation on pregnancy loss. Of 270 pregnancies known to be exposed to Pfizer Covid-19 vaccination prior to February 2021, there is a record of the outcome for only 33. Out of the 33 cases, only one of the pregnancies had a normal outcome, the rest being mostly miscarriages or stillbirths.
In another Exposé article from December 1st of 2021, not one year after the rollout of the “COVID vaccines,” researches were calling for the immediate removal of the shots from the market. They stated the following:
Together, IPAK believes the data are compelling enough to withdraw the shots for vulnerable populations. Noting their advice in boldface, they say:15
“Considering the evidence presented here, we suggest the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X) and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population, until more convincing data relating to the safety and long-term impacts on fertility, pregnancy and reproduction are established in these groups.”
Famously, an altered and manipulated study on female fertility (shown above), claimed the following:
…the rate of incidence of miscarriage was 82%, not 12.6% as presented in the findings of the study, and the authors of the study have since admitted that they made a mistake, issuing a correction six months too late, because the study has been used to justify Covid-19 vaccination of pregnant women and new mothers around the world.
But now two researchers from New Zealand have re-analysed the study and called for countries to halt the administration of Covid-19 vaccines to pregnant and breastfeeding women immediately due to extremely concerning findings.
The correction resolved some of the issues, but there are still more, according to Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Dr. Aleisha Brock, another researcher in New Zealand.
According to Dr. Thronley “The article’s conclusions haven’t changed substantially as we believe is warranted from our re-analysis of the association related to early exposure to the vaccine in pregnancy, which indicates a substantially increased risk from background.”
Thornley and Brock re-analyzed the data and calculated the incidence of miscarriages in the first trimester was actually 82 percent (as concluded previously by The Exposé) to 91 percent in a paper (see here) published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law.
At this point it’s safe to conclude that the COVID bio-weapon negatively impacts all reproductive organs in both men and women, and it dramatically decreases the chances of fertility or healthy pregnancy among injected parties, where either one or both individuals are injected with the “COVID vaccine.”
Now, regarding the presence of “COVID vaccines” within injected individuals and the presence of damaged DNA, thereby leading to a permanently compromised immune system (i.e., AIDS/VAIDS), this Exposé article referenced the following from a study:
A scientific paper on the Covid-19 virus was recently published. The paper was not written by a bunch of random scientists, but instead written by people from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, including the infamous Shi Zheng-Li. It was originally submitted in September 2021 and revised in January 2022, before finally being published March 11th 2022.
The paper claims the following:
Many patients who had severe Sars-Cov-2 had “lymphopenia”, that is, depletion of the all important immune T lymphocyte cells.
This depletion was caused by cellular suicide (apoptosis) of T cells after infection.
In experimental setups involving infecting laboratory cell lines of human T cells, Sars-Cov-2 virus was able to penetrate and infect T cells.
This tropism (attraction to) T cells and ability to infect them was UNRELATED to the usual way Sars-Cov-2 infects other cells, such as lung cells, that express ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptors, because T cells do not have those receptors.
Infection of T cells occurs via “LFA-1, the protein [that] exclusively expresses in multiple leukocytes”.
It turns out that HIV’s gp120 protein is the one that “Activates LFA-1 on CD4 T-Lymphocytes and Increases Cell Susceptibility to LFA-1-Targeting Leukotoxin”.
HIV’s gp120 protein was also mysteriously transplanted into Sars-Cov-2.
Additionally, the gp120 protein is located in the spike protein of Sars-Cov-2, and the spike protein is used in every available Covid-19 injection.
So SARS-CoV-2 destroys immune T cells just like HIV does. It also has a transplanted gp120 HIV insert, and it is that specific gp120 insert that allows HIV to enter lymphocytes via the same LFA-1 receptor. So is SARS-CoV-2 airborne HIV? And have hundreds of millions of people now been injected with HIV numerous times in the form of a Covid-19 vaccine?
Now, let’s review before getting to the sexually-transmitted part of this.
mRNA or nanotechnology is found in blood, all organs of the body, bodily fluids, the brain, and every other part of the body including damaging the DNA of injected individuals. So, how would the “COVID” injected not be able to sexually transmit this poison from one person to another?
The proof lies not only in first hand accounts, but it lies in the media and corrupt medical establishment’s own responses to the presence of a dramatic uptick in STD/STI’s in recent years.
First, they, (the CDC), actually blame the presence of “COVID” and “COVID testing” as the reasons that testing for STD’s/STI’s has fallen by the wayside. They actually believe that testing is a preventative measure and because there was so much testing for “COVID,” STD/STI testing was limited and this is why the rates have skyrocketed since the “COVID vaccine” rollout. Remember, too, they also blame STD/STI’s on “COVID,” not the actual “COVID Vaccine.”
Bullshit.
The CDC even states in their article above:
In 2022, the total number of STIs reported was higher than the number reported in 2020.
So, what happened between 2020 and 2022? What has been introduced since late 2020 to the current date? You guessed it; the COVID bio-weapon.
The American Medical Association is also making this connection and underhanded admission that STD’s are on the rise.
In the above conversation between AMA Vice President of Science, Medicine and Public Health, Andrea Garcia, JD, MPH, and AMA Chief Experience Officer Todd Unger, the medical doctor blames “COVID” and the old gaslighting aspect of a “stigma” associated with a lack of STD testing, when she stated:
Unger: Well that is really concerning. Andrea, why are STIs increasing now, and what can we do about it?
Garcia: Well, it really represents a combination of factors contributing to this overall rise in STI cases. And we've talked before about how the pandemic has exacerbated other health care conditions. This is another one of them. And according to that same CDC article, it's the lack of access to health care, including testing and treatment for STIs. It's decreased funding for public health, which is also a major driver. And the other thing to keep in mind is stigma plays a role here and impacting whether or not people seek access to care for STIs. Dr. Mena went on to say that to make progress towards ending the STI epidemic, we really need to meet people where they are. We need to develop tailored and localized interventions to have the greatest impact, and we want to make sure that we're addressing the social and economic conditions that make it more difficult for some of these populations to stay healthy.
As the article headline above states, how could STD’s be at an all-time high without a cause?
Finally, from a historic standpoint, I encourage everyone to watch all parts of the 2021 documentary The Viral Delusion. What you will learn is that “HIV” was never real, just like “COVID” isn’t real. These were the fairy tales that were sold to the public in order to scare them, and then preprogram them into taking a biological weapon as the so-called preventative cure.
HIV, while not being real, is also NOT sexually transmitted. Those who were claiming to have been HIV positive and gaining HIV from their sexual partners during the HIV hysteria, were in fact not doing so. But, they were poisoning themselves via numerous methods including pharmaceutical injections such as Hepatitis-B shots. They were also damaging their DNA with drug use, intravenous drug use, and inhalants.
However, now we have “gain of function” with the “COVID vaccine.” “Gain of function” is code language for “more transmissible.” As stated above in the linked article from 2004, the enemy has been studying mRNA since before 2004, specifically within reproductive fluid. This was the missing link that the non-existent HIV story lacked from the past. It’s the literal sexual transmission of a poison after one or more sexual partners have been vaccinated with said poison.
Can the mRNA or nanotechnology from the “COVID” shots be sexually-transmitted, directly through semen and vaginal fluid, in particular if one or both parties are injected with one or more rounds of the “COVID vaccine?” My common sense conclusion is yes. The COVID bio-weapon poison can travel within the reproductive organs of both males and females. It can travel in the breast milk of females, the placenta and umbilical cord of the female to the unborn child, and it’s located within the testicles and prostate gland in males. So, it seems clear to me that the COVID injected can transmit that poison, if present within reproductive fluid, from one partner to another, in particular if either partner is COVID injected, or their immune systems are in a weakened state, thereby making them more susceptible to accepting the poison with an inability to fight it off.
The sexual transmission of the COVID bio-weapon shots need to be studied more, if they haven’t been already, and these reproductive fluids need to be checked for mRNA/nano-technology moving forward. Any results must be formally brought to the public’s attention upon further discovery.
BIO: Dr. Sean M. Brooks is the host of the podcast American Education FM and the author of several books including; The Unmasking of American Schools: The Sanctioned Abuse of Americas Teachers and Students. He’s also on Gab, Truth, X, Bitchute, Rumble and everywhere audio podcasts can be heard.
My niece, was C jabbed had fertility issues and went to one very expensive Dr/ Specialist that asked did she have the C-shot. Indeed she had and he said that was part of the reason she was not conceiving. I have another niece, also jabbed, tried for over a year, and finally got pregnant. How sad for those that will struggle, as they will pour more $$ at Drs now treating more of this, as they try to have a baby. The medical establishment is making out like a fat rat, on all the illnesses that have come from this poison.